Last updated: 2018-11-03

workflowr checks: (Click a bullet for more information)
  • R Markdown file: up-to-date

    Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

  • Environment: empty

    Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.

  • Seed: set.seed(20180529)

    The command set.seed(20180529) was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.

  • Session information: recorded

    Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.

  • Repository version: 94e117a

    Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.

    Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
    
    Ignored files:
        Ignored:    .Rhistory
        Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
        Ignored:    analysis/.Rhistory
        Ignored:    docs/.DS_Store
        Ignored:    docs/figure/Test.Rmd/
    
    Untracked files:
        Untracked:  analysis/MASHbaselineCode.Rmd
        Untracked:  analysis/mashMean.Rmd
    
    Unstaged changes:
        Modified:   analysis/mashrEMlk.Rmd
    
    
    Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
Expand here to see past versions:
    File Version Author Date Message
    Rmd 94e117a zouyuxin 2018-11-03 wflow_publish(“analysis/susieProblem.Rmd”)
    html f6c387c zouyuxin 2018-11-03 Build site.
    Rmd 4bad779 zouyuxin 2018-11-03 wflow_publish(“analysis/susieProblem.Rmd”)


We show the problem using simulated data N3finemapping in susieR package.

We observed in a summary statistics setting where we get summary stats from full data but later put a smaller n for sample size into the computation. Then the ``good’’ result (also from good initialization) did not give the largest elbo. Rather a bad result (from a random initialization) did.

library(susieR)
data(N3finemapping)
attach(N3finemapping)
b <- data$true_coef[,1]
plot(b, pch=16, ylab='effect size', main='true effect size')

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-1-1.png:
Version Author Date
f6c387c zouyuxin 2018-11-03

The summary statistics come from per-variable univariate simple regression. The results are \(\hat{\beta}\) and \(SE(\hat{\beta})\) from which the p-values (from t-distribution) and \(z\)-scores can be derived.

p_values = 2 * pt(-abs(sumstats[1,,1] / sumstats[2,,1]), df = nrow(data$X) - 2)
z_scores = abs(qnorm(p_values/2)) * sign(sumstats[1,,1])
susie_plot(z_scores, y = "z", b=b)

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-2-1.png:
Version Author Date
f6c387c zouyuxin 2018-11-03

For this example the correlation matrix can be computed directly from data provide,

R <- cor(data$X)

The susie_z function converts the z scores to t statistics based on the provided sample size, n.

Correct sample size

The model with the correct sample size is:

fitted = susie_z(z = z_scores, R = R, n = nrow(data$X), L =10, 
                 scaled_prior_variance = 0.1, estimate_residual_variance = TRUE)
susie_plot(fitted, y='PIP', b=b)

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-4-1.png:
Version Author Date
f6c387c zouyuxin 2018-11-03

The elbo is -790.0413521.

Small sample size n=150 with different L

par(mfrow=c(2,3))
Ls = c(3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 21)
for(l in Ls){
  fitted_n = susie_z(z = z_scores, R = R, n = 150, L=l,
                 scaled_prior_variance = 0.1, estimate_residual_variance = TRUE)
  susie_plot(fitted_n, y='PIP', b=b, main = paste0('L = ', l, ' elbo = ',
                                                   susie_get_objective(fitted_n)))
}

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-5-1.png:
Version Author Date
f6c387c zouyuxin 2018-11-03

par(mfrow=c(1,1))

If we set the initial as the truth:

s.init = susie_init_coef(which(b!=0), b[which(b!=0)], ncol(data$X))
fitted_z <- susie_z(z = z_scores, 
                    R = R, n = 150, L = 10, 
                    scaled_prior_variance = 0.1, s_init=s.init,
                    estimate_residual_variance = TRUE)
susie_plot(fitted_z, y="PIP", b=b, main = paste0('L = 10 elbo = ',
                                                   susie_get_objective(fitted_z)))

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-6-1.png:
Version Author Date
f6c387c zouyuxin 2018-11-03

The model with the good initialization has lower objective than the model with a random initialization.

Session information

sessionInfo()
R version 3.5.1 (2018-07-02)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS  10.14

Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.5/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.5/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib

locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base     

other attached packages:
[1] susieR_0.6.1.0385

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] workflowr_1.1.1   Rcpp_0.12.19      lattice_0.20-35  
 [4] digest_0.6.18     rprojroot_1.3-2   R.methodsS3_1.7.1
 [7] grid_3.5.1        backports_1.1.2   magrittr_1.5     
[10] git2r_0.23.0      evaluate_0.12     stringi_1.2.4    
[13] whisker_0.3-2     R.oo_1.22.0       R.utils_2.7.0    
[16] Matrix_1.2-14     rmarkdown_1.10    tools_3.5.1      
[19] stringr_1.3.1     yaml_2.2.0        compiler_3.5.1   
[22] htmltools_0.3.6   knitr_1.20        expm_0.999-3     

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr 1.1.1